Can You Live with Your Choices?
By
Jeffrey M. Bowen
I got my usual ingredients, but as I
watched others place their orders the next morning, I hatched a few
theories.
I wondered why so many immediately lined
up at the omelet counter without stopping to look over the prepared choices
sitting nearby. Some just ordered eggs, and then had choices of fried,
scrambled, or poached, over easy or hard, on the spot. Customized choices made
people feel special. People love preferences.
I
concluded that too many choices can produce confusion. Research shows that people like the idea of
having many choices available. Yet the act of choosing may prove
frustrating. When choices are limited at
the start, we may be unhappy initially, but after choice is made, we become
happier with our decision than when we make the very same choice from the
bigger menu. House or car purchases in a
buyers’ market suggest a similar disappointment. A surfeit of choices spawns “buyers’
remorse.”
Yet another possibility comes from my
having turned promptly to familiar bacon and cheese. When confronted by the time constraint of a
quick decision, we tend to go with what we know best, and what we know will
taste good.
The term for this phenomenon is
“satisficing”. Given certain
circumstances -- like a line of plate holders standing behind you -- making the
right or ideal choice becomes less important and less stressful than making a
choice that seems good enough at the time.
This is like an archer’s decision when first he shoots an arrow, and
then he paints a target around it.
Many avoid making a choice at all. In an election we call this an
abstention. Among many reasons for
stubbornly refusing to choose is disliking all the ingredients (candidates?) or
protesting them, or just being indecisive.
My career experience in education
suggests another way to avoid or delay making a choice. Sometimes it is strategically useful to call
for lots more research before deciding.
As one of Parkinson’s laws suggests, “Delay is the deadliest form of
denial.”
There is still another possibility for
coping with the omelet line. What if my
wife had been standing beside me? I could have asked, “What choice do you
recommend?” She might have said, “This
is what I know you like!” In culinary
matters, often she knows me better than myself.
The point is, when a choice must be made, welcome reliable advice from
others we trust. Undoubtedly, this is
one of the best ways to find an excellent restaurant.
Every one of our choices, big ones like
what career to pursue, or smaller ones like when to get out of bed in the morning, is
constrained by a context. We do not pay
enough attention to the factors that influence our choices. This can be crucial when we are expected to
make choices for others. Do we stop to ask what prejudices we are bringing to
that person’s table?
Our predispositions can be influenced by
our culture, personality, our sense of self-control, or simply the way a choice
makes us feel. I am not sure where
omelets fit on my emotional scale, but I do know that choices can be anything
but economically rational. I had already
paid for my eggs.
In his classic book, Future Shock, published
50 years ago, Alvin Toffler pointed to “overchoice” as a villain. Technology
and the internet certainly produce information overload. The act of making choices can produce mental
fatigue.
There are some ways to make the demands
of choice less taxing. Not all of them
work at once, but it can be helpful to figure out ways to reduce our options at
the start. Know the consequences of each
choice by making them as specific as possible.
Put choices into simplified categories you can manage. Set a deadline to avoid proliferating choices
and unnecessary delays.
At times choices seem like separate threads. However, they interweave and become the fabric of our lives. Choices become not just what we wear, but who we are. When you make a choice, the best question is not whether it is the right decision, but whether you want to live with it.